Skip to main content

Problem Statement

Structural Fragmentation in AI and Blockchain Infrastructure​

The blockchain and artificial intelligence sectors are experiencing unprecedented growth, yet they remain fundamentally isolated from one another. This structural fragmentation creates critical barriers to the development of autonomous, intelligent systems capable of operating across decentralized networks.

Centralization of AI Infrastructure​

  • Approximately 95% of AI inference operations are executed through centralized providers
  • API access is subject to unilateral revocation without notice
  • Pricing structures lack transparency and are vulnerable to arbitrary modification
  • Rate limiting mechanisms impose constraints on scalability
  • User data is exposed to third-party custody and potential misuse

Developers building autonomous agents lack access to resilient, censorship-resistant AI infrastructure, creating systemic dependency on centralized gatekeepers.

Single-Chain Constraint in Blockchain Agents​

  • Agents deployed on Ethereum cannot natively interact with Solana or other networks
  • Each blockchain requires independent wallet management, native gas tokens, and chain-specific infrastructure
  • Cross-chain operations necessitate complex, trust-dependent bridging protocols
  • Liquidity and execution capabilities remain fragmented across isolated ecosystems

Developers are unable to construct truly autonomous agents capable of reasoning and executing across the full spectrum of blockchain networks, limiting the scope and utility of decentralized applications.

Gas Token Management Complexity​

  • Interacting with multiple blockchains requires acquiring and managing distinct gas assets (ETH, SOL, MATIC, etc.)
  • Multi-token management introduces operational overhead and increases the likelihood of execution failure
  • Users must manually bridge assets and perform token swaps to maintain cross-chain operability
  • Gas price volatility across networks introduces unpredictability in transaction costs

High barriers to entry for developers and degraded user experience, particularly for applications requiring frequent cross-chain interactions.

Absence of Quality Assurance in Decentralized AI​

  • Existing decentralized AI networks employ random miner selection without performance-based differentiation
  • Economic incentives do not reward high-quality inference or penalize low-effort submissions
  • Spam and substandard outputs are prevalent due to lack of accountability mechanisms
  • No standardized framework exists to evaluate and rank provider performance

Decentralized AI remains unsuitable for production environments where reliability and consistency are critical requirements.